Evaluation and Impact Analyses

The analysis covers the design and implementation of the 'Funding Announcement for Applied Non-nuclear Research Funding' and the guideline for 'Funding of Energy Transition Real Laboratories' within the 7th Energy Research Programme 'Innovations for the Energy Transition' of the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. The evaluation intends to provide a basis for steering and continuously improving the programme. The focus of the analysis is a proportionality check of the aid as well as the target achievement and effectiveness of the measures. Within the framework of the comprehensive evaluation design, a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods are used.

Within the framework of the project, the klimaaktiv climate protection initiative was evaluated together with the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. Internal and external reports, personal interviews with key stakeholders, an online survey of the partner network and a strategy workshop formed the basis for the evaluators. They evaluated the klimaaktiv program period 2013 to 2020. Based on the results, indications were developed on how to design the program phase until 2030. The results show that klimaaktiv is effective, well organized and has built up a powerful network. The activities are to be expanded and intertwined with upcoming measures and funding.

Project partner: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy

Client: Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Regions and Tourism

Further information & study download

The study explores the competitiveness of the engineering industries in the EU against its major competitors USA, Japan, South Korea and the BRICs countries. It compares regulatory frameworks of EU and major third country competitors in the field of engineering industries. Furthermore, it analyses the impact of digitalisation on the EU engineering industries and its effects on the global market position. The study also provides a strategic outlook and an assessment of the challenges and opportunities ahead for the European engineering industries.

The evaluation analyses the instrument "BMVIT endowed professorship" and develops recommendations for the further development of the instrument. The focus is on the organisational and structural framework conditions for endowed professorships from the perspective of the sponsor and the universities. The evaluation focuses on questions regarding the appropriate design of the instrument with regard to the intended funding objectives. In addition, the integration of the instrument into the national funding environment and the positioning of endowed professorships in the Austrian university and higher education landscape is examined.

German Report

Within the framework of the "funding focus on talents" ("Förderschwerpunkt Talente), (potential) researchers are funded in the application-oriented, scientific and technical RTI area. The funding instruments are aimed at children and young people (internships for pupils, regional talents) as well as researchers (career grants, job exchange) and address equal opportunities in research (FEMtech student internships, FEMtech career (check), FEMtech research projects). The Research Partnerships ("Forschungspartnerschaften") program supports dissertation projects in companies and non-university research institutions. The evaluation focuses on the analysis of the funding concepts, the implementation and the effects of the programmes.

Contact person: Eva Heckl

Client: Federal Ministry for Climate Protection, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology

Project duration: 05/2020 - 02/2021

Downloads (only executive summary available in English):

• Report Talente - Evaluierung des Förderschwerpunkts
• Report Forschungspartnerschaften – industrienahe Dissertationen - Programmevaluierung 

The evaluation of this support programme of the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) covers the period 2011-2018. Programme implementation is largely embedded in the Federal Government's space strategy and Germany's involvement in the European Space Agency ESA.

The study focuses on the achievement of the objectives and the effects of the programme, as well as on the cost-effectiveness of programme implementation by the Space Management (RFM) of the German Aerospace Agency (DLR). The analysis focuses on questions of internal organization and governance of programme implementation, as well as the implementation of large-scale missions. Apart from the actual programme performance, we also develop a concept for an increased future evaluability of the programme.

Contact: Mag. Peter Kaufmann

Project partners: Dr. Christiane Kerlen Evaluation und Beratung, Institut für Innovation und Technik (iit) in der VDI/VDE Innovation + Technik GmbH

The German government wants to use the R&D tax credit to help increase the share of R&D expenditure in gross domestic product to 3.5 % by 2025 and to supplement the existing project funding. In this project, the Austrian Institute for SME Research and the Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS) as well as the Ifo Institute Munich investigate the possible databases and methodological challenges for a future evaluation of the measure. The results lead to a coordinated evaluation plan, which should allow a deep analysis of the impacts.

In this project, The Austrian Institute for SME Research (KMFA) supports Innosuisse in developing a concept for the agency's impact analysis. In this context, impact logics for the most important funding instruments and the agency as a whole are developed. These form the basis for the development of an indicator system that can provide information on its own activities and the resulting effects to the client, policymakers and the public in a clear systematic manner.

The outcomes of the impact analysis concept are used for strategic optimisation and learning for the whole organisation.

The evaluation of the German Central Innovation Programme for SMEs (ZIM) with its three R&D programme pillars - individual projects, cooperation projects and innovation networks concerns one of the most important instruments of innovation policy in Germany.

The evaluation focused on the programme period 2015 to mid-2018 and integrated a theory-based approach with a strong empirical basis. Methodologically, the evaluation implemented a coordinated set of analytical-quantitative and qualitative approaches, such as a control group approach as well as a broad set of qualitative methods, including the analysis of spillover-effects of the different programme pillars.

This evaluation commissioned by the Federal Ministry for Climate Protection, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK, formerly BMVIT) examined the Austrian space commitment in the period 2012 to 2018 and derived corresponding recommendations for further development. This includes not only the design of the future space strategy, the relevant commitment at ESA and at the level of the European Union, but also the Austrian Space Applications Programme (ASAP), Austria's national space programme.

The evaluation was coordinated by the Austrian Institute for SME Research (KMU Forschung Austria) and implemented in close cooperation with the Institute for Innovation and Technology (iit) in VDI/VDE Innovation + Technik GmbH and inspire research GmbH.

The study on behalf of DG GROW assessed the feasibility of including societal criteria (environmental, innovation, employment-related) in upstream space procurement within the European Union Space Programmes, Copernicus, Galileo and EGNOS. The study required carrying out three tasks: Task 1) Investigate the legal feasibility of including societal criteria in the procurement of infrastructures for the EU Space Programmes, Task 2) Estimate the impact of including selected societal criteria and Task 3) Draw conclusions regarding the most appropriate societal criteria to be included in future procurement.

The accompanying impact analysis and evaluation of the Swiss "CTI Entrepreneurship" Training Programms assesses its conception, implementation and short to medium-term effects. The analysis, carried out by the Austrian Institute for SME Research in cooperation with B, S, S Volkswirtschaftliche Beratung AG in Basel, is based on theories of social psychology and their empirical implementation against the background of heterogeneous support infrastructures in the Swiss regions.

This accompanying evaluation of the implementation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) 2014-20 in Austria involves a consortium of six partners, and applies a broad evaluation design.

From the variety of methodologies applied in this evaluation, the Austrian Institute for SME Research implements, apart from some qualitative analyses, a conditional difference-in-difference to investigate the impact of ERDF subsidies on enterprises.

This project implements the accompanying research of a technical research project, which shows the economic and technical potential of the external component activation for the renovation of existing buildings with prefabricated façade elements and defines the respective conditions and develops new methods. Above all, the accompanying research includes analyses along the project-relevant value chain, such as analyses, of needs as well as potential impacts etc.

The impact monitoring of RTDI funding for Austrian companies and research organisations, managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG), assesses direct impacts of the funded projects on RTDI inputs, behavioural changes, and outputs. The results of the analyses serve as an input for the further development of the portfolio of the funding agency.

Climate and Energy Model Regions (KEM) is a programme of the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund (KLIEN), which supports regions in the development and implementation of climate change-related measures. The evaluation focuses on the design, implementation, the outcomes as well as the impacts of the program, and derives recommendations for the follow-up period.

The interim evaluation analyses the quality of the mission-oriented RTDI programme „Mobilität der Zukunft“ (mobility of the future). Main focus of the evaluation is on the analysis of the programme design and the processes with special attention to the learning processes within the programme. The output and the preliminary outcomes of the programme are reviewed compared to the objectives (targets and indicators). At the same time indicators of the programme selected for an internal impact assessment are evaluated. The evaluation is based on a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods.

The subject of the project is the evaluation of the programme(s) for the promotion of studies for commercial, international technology transfer" (kit4market, kit4market 2.0). The evaluation focuses on answering evaluation questions on programme design, the integration of the programme into the relevant funding portfolio, the programme processes and the effects achieved so far. To this end, interviews are conducted with programme owners and Austria Wirtschaftsservice Gesellschaft mbH (aws), and the funding recipients are asked about their experiences with the program and the effects achieved.

In 2017 and 2018 the implementation of HORIZON 2020 and ERA, as well as EUREKA, COSME and EEN in Austria was evaluated by a consortium consisting of AIT, Joanneum Research, KMFA and ZSI. The evaluation focused on three key areas: 1. Evaluation of Austrian Research Promotion Agency’s (FFG) advisory and support services for HORIZON 2020, EUREKA, COSME, EEN and ERA 2. EU performance monitoring of FFG 3. The ERA Observatory Austria, which forms an overarching framework for the integration of the individual tasks in the field of governance for EU-RTI policy in Austria on the part of the BMBWF (Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research).

The evaluation analyses to what extent the concept for innovation promoting public procurement (IÖB) established in 2011 has been successfully implemented or whether the corresponding setting enables efficient implementation. The evaluation is based on a mixture of quantitative and qualitative methods and also develops recommendations for further implementation with the help of an international comparison.

The BRIDGE programme funds basic science research projects at universities and other public research organisations that already demonstrate realistic application prospects. Thus, the BRIDGE funding will facilitate the transfer of basic science results into industrial applications.
Companies participate in these projects financially or non-financially by providing equipment and guidance to the research institutes. The evaluation focuses on the different facets of impacts of the programme and on the more recent modifications in the programme design during the period 2009 up to 2016.

This evaluation aims to analyse the portfolio of Upper Austria’s funding and support measures provided to companies. At the centre of this exercise is the analysis of the interplay of different measures with regard to their conceptual and design-based orientation towards additionality and broadness/specificity. Based on the results, the evaluation will develop recommendations for the client’s future funding and support policies after 2020.

The evaluation of the AWS and FFG promotion agencies essentially addresses the question whether and to what extent ambitions and expectations of the predecessor organisations consolidations, which happened in the context of the structural reforms more than a decade ago, have been achieved. Applying a theory-based evaluation approach (TBE) the evaluation analyses organisational and content-related functionalities, inherent properties, functional logics and impacts of both institutions, in order to draw action-relevant conclusions.

Contact: Peter Kaufmann

Download Report (German only)

The overall objective of this study was to evaluate the results and impacts of the participating SMEs within two initiatives of FP7: the cooperation programme and the research for the benefit of SMEs schemes under the capacities programme, including the impacts on economic performance, European added value, behavioural additionality and innovation. The evaluation study assessed the relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of the two initiatives.